Look Back History
Look Back History
  • 97
  • 5 407 999
How Did the Anschluss Actually Happen? | Why Austria Fell to Germany in 1938
How did Germany annex Austria?
In 1938 the German army faced no resistance when it invaded Austria. Within two days the 'Anschluss' or 'Joining' of the two countries had been decreed and many newly minted Germans believed they could look forward to a prosperous future. But it had taken two decades of social chaos in Austria - plus a coercive pressure campaign by Berlin - to bring most Austrians into line. The ease of the Anschluss of March 13th, 1938, was due to both the virulence of a Germany readying to march to war and the ineptitude of the Austrian regime.
Subscribe for more history:
ua-cam.com/users/LookBackHistory
More Videos:
What Began the Spanish Civil War?: ua-cam.com/video/-K_J4rr659Y/v-deo.html
How Did the Allies Divide Germany?: ua-cam.com/video/OVsDc7fUiHQ/v-deo.html
Why Does Luxembourg Exist?: ua-cam.com/video/-4n_xYGTyr8/v-deo.html
Why Did Italy Take Rhodes?: ua-cam.com/video/iOQzicYxjo4/v-deo.html
What Was Yugoslavism?: ua-cam.com/video/J6N-q6tAHAc/v-deo.html
Sources Consulted:
Bukey, Evan Burr. Hitler’s Austria: Popular Sentiment in the Nazi Era, 1938-45. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000. archive.org/embed/hitlersaustriapo0000buke_n8x4
Miller, Stuart T. Mastering Modern European History. London: Macmillan Education LTD, 1990.
Pauley, Bruce. Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini: Totalitarianism in the 20th Century. 4th ed. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2015.
Переглядів: 13 538

Відео

What Began the Spanish Civil War? | How Extremism Scarred Spain
Переглядів 33 тис.Місяць тому
Why did Spain descend into civil war? In the mid-1930s, most European countries were wary of war with their foreign neighbours but in Spain war was about to break out on the streets. Political issues ranging from the place of an established Church in society, to pay concerns, unemployment, and land ownership tore Spain apart. The left and right became increasingly polarised, and eventually spli...
Why Does Luxembourg Exist?
Переглядів 80 тис.3 місяці тому
Why does the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg exist? States like Luxembourg were the norm in Europe for hundreds of years but come the French Revolution and the advent of industrialization, tiny monarchical fiefdoms quickly fell out of fashion. But Luxembourg survived to the present day - outlasting expansionists from all directions. Napoleonic France, the United Netherlands, revolutionary Belgium, an...
What Broke the United Netherlands? | The Belgian Revolution Explained
Переглядів 85 тис.4 місяці тому
How did Belgium break away from the Netherlands? In 1815, after centuries apart, the Low Countries ('Netherlands') were merged together into a single state: the United Kingdom of the Netherlands under William I of the House of Orange. Less than two decades later, the United Netherlands came to an end. The Belgian Revolution was sparked by an economic downturn, but it grew out of control because...
Why Did Italy Take Rhodes? | Italian Colonization of the Dodecanese
Переглядів 92 тис.5 місяців тому
Why did Italy colonize the Dodecanese Islands? The 1912 Italo-Turkish War saw the island of Rhodes and the surrounding Dodecanese claimed by Italy. For the next three decades, the Italians ruled the islands but their outlook on the colony and the people of Rhodes shifted dramatically over time as regimes rose and fell in Rome. Subscribe for more history: ua-cam.com/users/LookBackHistory More Vi...
How Did Atatürk Beat Greece & the Entente? | The Turkish War of Independence
Переглядів 134 тис.6 місяців тому
How did Turkey survive the end of World War One? The defeat of the Ottoman Empire left it at the mercy of Britain, France, Italy, and Greece. The Sultan in Constantinople had surrendered to the Entente, but Turks as a whole were not content to be occupied. Under Mustafa Kemal (later, Atatürk) and the banner of the Turkish National Movement, they would fight the Turkish War of Independence and c...
What Was the Megali Idea? | The Growth of Greece Explained
Переглядів 144 тис.8 місяців тому
What made Greece grow? Right after securing its independence from the Ottoman Empire, the Kingdom of Greece contained only a quarter of the world's Greeks. The remainder still lived under the Ottomans or would come to be colonial subjects of other powers. That situation was obviously untenable. Amongst the Greeks, the notion of Greater Greece―the Megali Idea―took root and was at the center of t...
Why Did Italy Become Fascist? | The Rise of Mussolini Explained
Переглядів 38 тис.9 місяців тому
How did Benito Mussolini take over Italy? Italian Fascism rose in a country that had just won a war, but didn't feel victorious. With politics and the economy both looking bleak, the Fascists appeared to many to be Italy's only hope. The rest, mainly Italy's Socialist Party, would be crushed underfoot by Mussolini's paramilitary Blackshirts, who in 1922 would make him Italy's leader by carrying...
What Was Yugoslavism? | The Messy Birth of the South-Slavic State
Переглядів 56 тис.10 місяців тому
Yugoslavia existed for over 70 years but never managed to truly unite its three main nationalities. According to proponents of Yugoslavism, the Croats, Serbs, and Slovenes were all one people (the Yugoslavs) split apart only by the empires of foreigners. Their attempt to forge a Yugoslav identity would be stymied by the messy reality of ethnicity and nationality in the Western Balkans. Subscrib...
How Did the Soviet Union Actually Work?
Переглядів 97 тис.11 місяців тому
How did the Soviet Union actually function? The USSR was a country of contradictions. It was a state purportedly founded to serve the interests of the working proletariat but that was always ruled either by a small elite (the Communist Party of the Soviet Union) or by one man alone, as it was under the dictator Joseph Stalin. In theory, the Soviet people had votes and a voice, but in practice, ...
How Did Prussia Become a Great Power? | Frederick the Great & Enlightened Despotism
Переглядів 66 тис.Рік тому
From humble beginnings, the Kingdom of Prussia came to be synonymous with military might. Voltaire called it "the army with a state." Prussia's rise began with the union of Brandenburg and Ducal Prussia in 1618, but it didn't become a Great Power until over a century later. Under Frederick the Great, Prussia ballooned in size, but far from being a common warlord, 'Der alte Fritz' was a man of t...
Why Did the Kaiser HAVE to Abdicate? | The 1918 German Revolution
Переглядів 66 тис.Рік тому
Why did Kaiser Wilhelm II have to abdicate? By late 1918, the German Empire was descending into chaos. World War I was clearly lost, and the German people were tired of fighting. Starvation afflicted thousands as national resources were directed toward the failing frontline, and the Empire's leaders appeared unconcerned by the suffering of the population. At the very least they (led and represe...
What Caused Division in Cyprus? | The Cypriot Partition Explained
Переглядів 40 тис.Рік тому
What caused the once-peaceful island of Cyprus to split in two? The answer lies in the inner workings of the complicated relationship between Cyprus' two main communities: the Greek and Turkish Cypriots. Both have made the island their home since long before the modern day but when the age of European imperialism came to an end, they each had very different ideas for what Cyprus should become. ...
How Did Bulgaria Unite? | The Bulgaria Crisis of 1885
Переглядів 47 тис.Рік тому
Why did a crisis break out in Ottoman Bulgaria in 1885? For four centuries Bulgaria was ruled by the Ottoman Empire but in 1878 (with the help of Russia) a new Bulgarian state came into being. As a result of Great Power politics at the Congress of Berlin, that state would be reduced in size, but the people of Bulgaria remained intent on reforging their country. Subscribe for more history: ua-ca...
How Did Romania Unite? | The Two Romanian Unifications
Переглядів 146 тис.Рік тому
How Did Romania Unite? | The Two Romanian Unifications
Why Does Qatar Exist? | House Al-Thani and the British Empire
Переглядів 118 тис.Рік тому
Why Does Qatar Exist? | House Al-Thani and the British Empire
How Did the Russian Empire Actually Work?
Переглядів 95 тис.Рік тому
How Did the Russian Empire Actually Work?
How Did the German Empire Actually Work?
Переглядів 145 тис.Рік тому
How Did the German Empire Actually Work?
How Did the Austro-Hungarian Empire Actually Work?
Переглядів 199 тис.Рік тому
How Did the Austro-Hungarian Empire Actually Work?
Why Was Hungary Partitioned After WWI? | The Treaty of Trianon
Переглядів 72 тис.Рік тому
Why Was Hungary Partitioned After WWI? | The Treaty of Trianon
How Was Germany Divided? | The Allied Occupation of Germany
Переглядів 50 тис.Рік тому
How Was Germany Divided? | The Allied Occupation of Germany
Who Was Harald Hardrada? | The Last Viking Conqueror
Переглядів 19 тис.Рік тому
Who Was Harald Hardrada? | The Last Viking Conqueror
How Did the Normans Conquer England? | The Reign of William the Conqueror
Переглядів 28 тис.Рік тому
How Did the Normans Conquer England? | The Reign of William the Conqueror
Why Aren't Finland and Sweden in NATO?
Переглядів 15 тис.Рік тому
Why Aren't Finland and Sweden in NATO?
What Caused the Iranian Revolution? | Iran's Revolution(s) Explained
Переглядів 85 тис.2 роки тому
What Caused the Iranian Revolution? | Iran's Revolution(s) Explained
How Did the US Annex Hawaii?
Переглядів 50 тис.2 роки тому
How Did the US Annex Hawaii?
Why Doesn't India Own Sri Lanka?
Переглядів 335 тис.2 роки тому
Why Doesn't India Own Sri Lanka?
What Was the Franco-Prussian War | The Franco-Prussian War Explained
Переглядів 50 тис.2 роки тому
What Was the Franco-Prussian War | The Franco-Prussian War Explained
What Ended the Ottomans? | The Fall of the Ottoman Empire
Переглядів 93 тис.2 роки тому
What Ended the Ottomans? | The Fall of the Ottoman Empire
Why Does Saudi Arabia Exist? | The Rise of the House of Saud
Переглядів 177 тис.2 роки тому
Why Does Saudi Arabia Exist? | The Rise of the House of Saud

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @nexxuzthenoble
    @nexxuzthenoble День тому

    *annexed

  • @hcaslanO
    @hcaslanO День тому

    "the government collapsed, and exactly why is a contentious matter." Really? Bloody Christmas (1963) 400 Turkish and 200 Greek Cypriots deaths ? You're a joke!

  • @Reichsritter
    @Reichsritter День тому

    what? they had been separate since 1866, that's 72 years not "hundreds of years "

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 День тому

    The fact that the South German states were more culturally like Austria than Prussia was probably why Bismarck was reluctant to use military force to get them to unite with Prussia. He probably and correctly feared that had any type of military force to get them to join Prussia that they would've likely turned to Austria for help, which would've made things very messy

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 День тому

    As I recall,as per the treaty which ended the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 to 1895, Korea entered Japan's sphere of influence. Also,as a result of the treaty that ended the Russo-Japanese War, not only was Russia forced to recognize Japanese claims to Korea,it also had to withdraw from and recognize Japan's claims to Manchuria

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 День тому

    Technically,South Africa was also independent in 1914 as well. In point of fact: German Southwest Africa became a mandate of South Africa after WW1,had South Africa not been independent at that point,ut would've been made a British mandate

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 День тому

    Also,if History Matters is right, the only country to publicly condemn Anschluss was Mexico. But given where Mexico was in relation to Germany and the fact that it was Mexico, it was pretty much ignored

  • @davidbraccini4770
    @davidbraccini4770 День тому

    The reason why Mussolini approved the annexation of Austria, besides the alliance after the Ethiopian war, was because Hitler promised that he would renounce all claims to south Tyrol and even relocate all of its inhabitants who didn’t want to stay in Italy. Even after the eight of September 1943 and the subsequent german occupation of Italy Germany kept its promise and still never formally annexed South Tyrol.

  • @Julian-tf5rb
    @Julian-tf5rb День тому

    Not all Austrians wanted the Anschluß. My grandparents were just those type of Austrians. My Grandfather was more loyal to the old Austro-Hungarian union. When WW1 ended and the A-H empire ceased to be, he took his family and got out.

    • @LookBackHistory
      @LookBackHistory День тому

      Absolutely. Cool to hear about your family history!

    • @Julian-tf5rb
      @Julian-tf5rb День тому

      @LookBackHistory Truth be told, there's a lot more to the story then what I told you. But long story, short.... that's how my fathers sidebof the Fam ended up in America.

  • @joshtroufield
    @joshtroufield 2 дні тому

    rip roman republic

  • @Hunter-cx6
    @Hunter-cx6 2 дні тому

    *Ballot paper: YES. Shot me.*

    • @LookBackHistory
      @LookBackHistory День тому

      It definitely made clear what you were supposed to vote for...

  • @liberalizzzm4908
    @liberalizzzm4908 2 дні тому

    8:16 wtf are you talking about 😭😭😭

  • @kgius7434
    @kgius7434 2 дні тому

    because nobody helped, the Italians betrayed us

  • @oliverschulte9659
    @oliverschulte9659 2 дні тому

    Mistake right in the beginning of the video: Austria was not separate from Germany since hundreds of years. Austria was one of the various German states who first formed the Holy Roman Empire until year 1806 and then the German Confederation from 1815 to 1866. It was only in 1866 that Austria was forced by Prussia to go separate ways. The German Federation ended in a war between its states with Prussia and its Northern allies winning and forcing the others under their rule, then calling the whole new thing "Germany". But Austria was explicitly excluded. It is a bit like as if the US Union had excluded Texas from the US after the Civil War in 1865. Back to the mistake in the video: Austria got kicked out of Germany in 1866, wanted to rejoin in 1919 (after WW1) and finally was semi-voluntarily joining Nazi-Germany in 1938.

  • @HolyknightVader999
    @HolyknightVader999 2 дні тому

    Maybe the Republicans would've lasted longer if they didn't try to persecute the Catholic Church in a country where most of the people were Catholic. You can talk about corrupt clergy all you like, but the fact is, many practicing Catholics among the plebians of Spain were persecuted just for practicing a religion that their forefathers practiced for centuries. These republicans just drove many common people into the arms of the nationalists, and given that Franco and many of the nationalists already had military support from Germany, Italy, and Britain, the Republicans only had the Soviets to count on, which made them a foreign power given that the Soviets were atheistic Communists attempting to conquer a Catholic country using the republicans as their patsies. It's like trying to invade Saudi Arabia and outlawing Islam. Unless you're ready to put half the country in graves, you can't do that and expect to win.

  • @bryant-fr7sr
    @bryant-fr7sr 2 дні тому

    They wanted and they got what they wanted

  • @nusantaranbrony7283
    @nusantaranbrony7283 2 дні тому

    Because they can deploy 400 thousand active troops

  • @Lucas_Antar
    @Lucas_Antar 2 дні тому

    Funny how people always wanna say thr Nazis were left when clear even the left didn’t want to join them and neither did the right.

  • @micahistory
    @micahistory 2 дні тому

    interesting, never saw anyone explain the details that led up to this event before

  • @jonnyminogue
    @jonnyminogue 2 дні тому

    Another good video about the, as History Matters says, the “toothbrush mustache having Austrian man”

  • @mosesracal6758
    @mosesracal6758 2 дні тому

    Even with this oversimplified explanation, I just cant understand Spanish Civil War politics

  • @lythd
    @lythd 2 дні тому

    important to note is that support for anschluss fell after hitlers rise to power

  • @theconqueringram5295
    @theconqueringram5295 2 дні тому

    It was pretty strait forward.

  • @a51raider
    @a51raider 2 дні тому

    Catholics were the biggest opponents of Nazis wdym

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 2 дні тому

    As I recall, the partitions of Poland were suggested by Russia as a way to appease Austria and Prussia. See, Austria and Prussia were growing nervous/concerned about Russia's increasing influence in the Ottoman Empire, nevermind all the territory they were taking from it.

  • @mypropmp4057
    @mypropmp4057 2 дні тому

    Bold and respectable decision for you to use the swastika despite UA-cam’s censoring spree! Please, continue the amazing work!

    • @LookBackHistory
      @LookBackHistory День тому

      To be fair to UA-cam, I think its mostly UA-camrs themselves imposing that sort of censoring. UA-cam's automated systems tend to flag videos like this (limiting potential income) but everything I've ever requested a manual review on has been approved swiftly.

  • @marcelbork92
    @marcelbork92 2 дні тому

    How did it "happen"? Two German divisons crossed unopposed the "border" and marched straight to Vienna, being greeted and welcomed all the way through with cheers and flowers. That was it.

  • @callnight1441
    @callnight1441 2 дні тому

    slight correction: the shortening "N*zi" comes from the German pronunciation of the word "National" (pronounced "Nah-tsio-nahl")

  • @edwinsparda7622
    @edwinsparda7622 2 дні тому

    Austria has been part of Germany for centuries until 1866. It's people wanted to join a centralized unified germany (but its leaders thought otherwise). Austria rejoining germany would be like Northern ireland rejoining the republic of ireland.

  • @NathanS__
    @NathanS__ 2 дні тому

    Saying Austria was separate from Germany for centuries is just plain incorrect. At best you can date Austria's separation to the rest of Germany to 1866 when Prussia broke the German Confederation, which the Austrian Emperor was President. Protestant Prussia purposely pushed catholic Austria away so Prussia could unite Germany and then the Habsburgs tried to stay independent from the Hohenzollern Germany so the Habsburgs would remain an imperial power. The idea that Austrians are not German at all is a post WWII idea.

    • @inactiveaccount
      @inactiveaccount День тому

      austria was independent way before 1866

    • @10Tabris01
      @10Tabris01 День тому

      @@inactiveaccount So was every other state in Germany. Doesn't change the fact that an Austria led unified Germany was a real possibility until the German Brothers War

    • @inactiveaccount
      @inactiveaccount День тому

      @@10Tabris01 no austria became independent during the habsburgs germany was still part of the hre, also austrians not being the same as germans isn’t a ww2 concept it is a fact if you look at a genetic map of europe you can see that austrians have a 25% slavic part in their genes that germans and swiss don’t have because of the austro hungarian empire, austrians are genetically more similar to hungarians than they are to germans, an austrian german unification only became possible because austrians wanted to be a part of an empire after the fall of austria hungary since austria went from being one of the richest countries to one of the poorest in europe after ww1, austria and austrians accepted the fact that their a small country and are happy to be an independent country after ww2

  • @KrokLP
    @KrokLP 2 дні тому

    Austria was part of Germany until the German Confederation was ended in 1856 and a customs union continued to exist long after. That's not "hundreds of years" before the Anschluß, but 82. And 18 years since the last loud calls for unification were forcibly suppressed by the Entente. And yeah, Hitler from even before taking power was solely focused on war and taking over the world. Seriously??

  • @FulmenTheFinn
    @FulmenTheFinn 2 дні тому

    0:15 Austria had NOT been separate from Germany for hundreds of years. Until 1866 the German Confederation, which included the German-speaking parts of Austria, and then some (most notably Bohemia and Moravia), was essentially synonymous with Germany. Hence why you have things like the German Civil War being another name for the Austro-Prussian War of 1866. Vienna had been the de facto capital of Germany for centuries, with the HRE becoming synonymous with the concept of Germany in the Middle Ages. To quote Wikipedia: "From 1250 onward, the association between "Germans" and the whole Empire became stronger. [...] At the same time, the replacement of Latin with German in official documents entrenched the German character of the empire at large. In 1474 the term "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation" appeared, becoming more common after 1512. However, even after 1560, only 1 in 9 official documents mention "Germany", and most omitted the rest as well and simply called it "the Empire". In 1544 the Cosmographia (Sebastian Münster) was published, which used "Germany" (Teütschland) as synonymous with the empire as a whole. Johann Jacob Moser also used "German" as a synonym for "Imperial". This conflated definition of "German" even included non-German speakers.[39]" During the 1848 nationalist revolutions throughout the German Confederation, the German nationalists naturally wanted to make the Austrian Emperor, Franz Joseph I, the Emperor of Germany. He turned it down, only for them to then offer it to the King of Prussia, Friedrich Wilhelm IV, who also turned it down. The latter saw Austria as the leader of Germany, and did not want a Germany separate of Austria. "Emperor Franz Joseph I of Austria had made it clear in November 1848 that he would not accept the title of "Emperor of the Germans" from the Frankfurt National Assembly because the Frankfurt Constitution would have required German-speaking Austria to have a separate constitution, government and administration from the rest of the Empire.[59] On 28 March 1849, the Assembly elected Frederick William IV as Emperor of the Germans, but he refused the crown. In a letter to a confidant, he wrote: "I can call God to witness that I do not want it, for the simple reason that Austria will then be separated from Germany."" Austria being something separate from Germany only really came about as an idea c. 1866-1871, and even then it was flimsy at best for the next nearly 100 years, as witnessed by the Austrian desire to join Germany in the aftermath of WW1 and during the interbellum before WW2. I'd even make the case that the first widely spread Austrian identity separate from that of Germany only became a thing when the first post-WW2 generations began reaching adulthood in the 1960s and 1970s.

    • @ryanhassett4720
      @ryanhassett4720 2 дні тому

      Finally someone gets it. Austria was not some distant independent German state it only stayed independent when the empire formed because of its own empire

    • @wolfgang6517
      @wolfgang6517 2 дні тому

      Ah yes, the famous German confederation of Germans that includes…. Poles, Czechs, Dames, Belgians and Lithuanians. Almost as if politics doesn’t care about language

    • @FulmenTheFinn
      @FulmenTheFinn 2 дні тому

      @@wolfgang6517 It seems you've somehow managed to completely miss the point of the post you're replying to.

    • @MuiltiLightRider
      @MuiltiLightRider 2 дні тому

      I think what he means is that Germany and Austria were never unified under one centralized state since the HRE and German Confederation were very decentralized

    • @wolfgang6517
      @wolfgang6517 2 дні тому

      @@MuiltiLightRider Germany as a nation state is a completely modern invention

  • @michaelowino228
    @michaelowino228 2 дні тому

    Good video.

  • @corneliussulla9963
    @corneliussulla9963 2 дні тому

    Spam crap

  • @user-os2yp6ph2z
    @user-os2yp6ph2z 2 дні тому

    It's almost like a trope throughout history. H1lter was from Austria, Napoleon from Corsica, Stalin from Georgia and so on..

    • @colindaniels945
      @colindaniels945 2 дні тому

      Except for one thing: Napoleon Bonaparte was Italian not French

    • @chiefchuck3897
      @chiefchuck3897 2 дні тому

      @@colindaniels945 and Stalin was Georgian, not Russian. And Hitler was Austrian, not (necessarily) German. Your point?

    • @Frd2004
      @Frd2004 2 дні тому

      The difference is Austria is German cultural and historical, corsica and Georgia werent

    • @LookBackHistory
      @LookBackHistory День тому

      Churchill was half- American. The founder of the current Swedish royal family was French. Catherine the Great was German.

    • @bcvetkov8534
      @bcvetkov8534 День тому

      ​@@colindaniels945This is incorrect but okay to off I guess.

  • @existentialcrisisactor
    @existentialcrisisactor 2 дні тому

    Fascism is far from stamped out. It now comes with a "Made in USA" sticker

  • @TheMexxodus
    @TheMexxodus 2 дні тому

    Amazingly Schuschnigg was arrested after the Anschluss and imprisoned in a concentration camp. And survived. He was liberated by the Americans in 1945. After the Second World War he went to the United States, became a professor of constitutional law at the University of St. Louis and acquired American nationality. In 1968 he returned to Austria, but did not enter politics again. Kurt Schuschnigg died in November 1977, four weeks before his 80th birthday.

  • @GreenPoint_one
    @GreenPoint_one 2 дні тому

    Betrayed by the fkng italians and then relying on them. Stupid!

  • @akindulger1930
    @akindulger1930 2 дні тому

    I agree with the atrocities committed by the Turks on the Armenian issue (a Turk would also oppose this). However, this is not something done unilaterally. In other words, no one said to the Armenians, "Oh, let's kill this Armenian" for no reason. Armenians and their supporters may be triggered, but I don't really care, Armenians were not that "threatening" country for us. The problem is, if you attack the innocent people of a country at war, while they are unarmed and without soldiers, you will receive a response. You will not cry the moment you are exposed to the response. For example, how did the Ottoman Empire grow so much? Have you ever thought ? He was implementing a policy called "İŞKAN". When the Ottomans conquered a region, they settled their own people there. In our understanding, there is no passion for killing innocent people and changing their religion/belief. Take a good look at the areas controlled by the Ottoman Empire; the language, belief and culture of not a single region has been changed. Likewise, look at African countries and colonial countries and you will understand the difference. Well, many Turks were settled in the Balkan region due to the "İŞKAN" policy. What do you think happened to those Turks in the lost wars and uprisings there? Do you think all of those Balkan countries were angels of goodness and sent people back to our country, or did they do something else? What do you think the Greeks (believe me, I have no problems with the Greeks, I love them) did to the Turks in their own country when they won the war and prepared to land in Izmir? Have you ever wondered this? Or will we accept such a thing as if it "never happened"? I don't have even a single grudge/hate towards Armenians, I am against hypocrisy. The Turks have acted wrongly, but it irritates me that they do not do this when we say "we showed the massacres of our own people and their cemeteries, now you show them". I want people who are impartial about these issues to make this comment themselves. Do you think this is fair?

  • @_Stand.With.Palestine_
    @_Stand.With.Palestine_ 2 дні тому

    Austria Painter Conquering His Own Country 💀

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 2 дні тому

    Yes Mussolini was against the German takeover of Austria, mainly because he had his own designs on it. He went along with it for 2 reasons: 1. He had no desire to piss off Hitler. 2. He saw Germany as the leading power in Europe at that point

  • @akindulger1930
    @akindulger1930 2 дні тому

    3:04 For this reason, if you want to annoy a Turkish friend, you can say "you are an Arab". This is a kind of insulting a Turk. In fact, there is no greater insult, you cannot find a greater insult against a Turk.

  • @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714

    The nazis where imperialist, not nationalist. Nationalists respect nations rights to self determination. Imperialist subjigate other nations.

    • @BritishRepublicsn
      @BritishRepublicsn 2 дні тому

      Nationalists respect THEIR OWN right to self determination, they generally don't care too much about other nations. Imperialism is just an extreme version of nationalism

    • @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714
      @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 2 дні тому

      @@BritishRepublicsn Nationalists respect EVERY nations right to self determination within their borders. Imperialism is the polar opposite of nationalism. Imperialists and nationalists are arch enemies and its the most common form of right wing vs right wing war, for example right now Russijan imperialists vs Ukrainian nationalists.

    • @raressipoteanu2827
      @raressipoteanu2827 2 дні тому

      Is bro for real

    • @bernd_das_brot6911
      @bernd_das_brot6911 2 дні тому

      @@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 They don’t tho if their nationality or national interest is being hurt by that nations internal affairs. Nationalism is just the belief that your country is the best and deserves to spread her influence, not any other bullcrap

    • @BritishRepublicsn
      @BritishRepublicsn 2 дні тому

      @@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 just because 2 nations are fighting, doesn't mean they're ideologically opposite. Your version of nationalists fight each other all the time

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 2 дні тому

    I'll quote History Matters: "Austria wanted to be part of Germany, just not THAT Germany."

    • @jonoc3729
      @jonoc3729 2 дні тому

      Most austrians supported unification, even with Hitler's Germany.

    • @colindaniels945
      @colindaniels945 2 дні тому

      @@jonoc3729 The fascist government prior to Anschluss didn't. In fact, they even allowed opposition parties,after banning them years earlier,on the condition that they oppose the Nazis. Even the video points that out

    • @wolfgang6517
      @wolfgang6517 2 дні тому

      @@jonoc3729 source?

    • @occam7382
      @occam7382 2 дні тому

      I see you are a man of culture.

    • @mnd9166
      @mnd9166 День тому

      ​@@colindaniels945 Yeah because Austrofascists were clerical, civic nationalist, anti-socialist and werent big on racism except Jews. Austrofascists werent even proper corporatists in economic manner, they practically copied things were they thought might work but never had the philosophical nor the ideological reasons behind them.

  • @lucianoosorio5942
    @lucianoosorio5942 2 дні тому

    “This enraged the Allies, who punished Germany severely.” Oversimplified Winston Churchill: I was saving the planet from an Axis of Darkness, while you were back home opening National Parks! Yes!

  • @rockstarzephyr439
    @rockstarzephyr439 3 дні тому

    ONCE AGAIN ENGLAND RUINS EVERYTHING

  • @yashasviliyanage1134
    @yashasviliyanage1134 4 дні тому

    This video does zero justice to the rich history of Sri Lanka. Kindly do proper research.

  • @denzblog2710
    @denzblog2710 4 дні тому

    I loved the part where he actually explained how the country functioned

  • @chrissandi9613
    @chrissandi9613 4 дні тому

    Gutes video. Aber, Moltke ist "Moltke", nicht "Moltky"!

  • @ZS-rw4qq
    @ZS-rw4qq 4 дні тому

    2:44 I really like how maps of the period make no distinction between Serbs and Croats